Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Marketing Beyond the 4 P's

I have been thinking about this for a while – why are we talking about 4 P’s of Service management? Where is the ‘Customer’?
Tweeted this thought earlier today – but definitely felt 140 characters are too less to express the thought clearly.
So what are the 4Ps of service management as per ITIL?
Oh – well, ITIL V3 has two sets of Four P’s . 4 P’s of Service Strategy and 4P’s of Service management (or Service Design). I am not talking here about the Four P’s of Service strategy. (So if you look at different books of ITIL v3 and search for Four P’s you get different full forms and explanations. Be aware…)
The four Ps that we are talking about here are:  People, Process, Products and Partners. Earlier, we used to talk about P-P-T ( people process and technology) or 3 Ps, which got extended to 4 Ps – understanding the unavoidable and significance and need for managing our partners (external suppliers) as well.
Still, aren’t we missing the core of Service management : the ‘Customer’?
Are we leaving out a core aspect because it doesn’t start with a P?  :-) FivePs
Ok then how about calling it Patron (starts with P!). Not bad, if we can call External Suppliers as Partners, then why don’t we call customers as Patrons’?
So now, we have the Five P’s of Service management !
Why is this important?
I have a few thoughts on that:
  • This will make the whole Service management centred on the key thing (where it should be) – the Customer!
  • Managing (and taking care of) your customer is as important ( if not more!)as managing your People, Processes, Products and Partners. This is also justified by the importance of processes like Business relationship management and SLM
  • Service Design (where ITIL is introducing the concept of Four Ps) should actually start with customer or should revolve around the central P – and make effective use of the other four Ps.
  • Talking about Business- IT integration – what better way than make customer/business (Patron) as a core aspect of your Service management framework itself?
So will ITIL V3 Revision 2 (which I doubt) or Version 4 make the ‘Customer’ (or Patron – or any other word that start with P!) as the central P of the Service management? Hope so….
Your thoughts are welcome!

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Marketing - Art or science?

I read a blog post the other day (unfortunately I didn't copy the URL and I don't remember which blog) where someone answered the good old marketing question being - "is marketing art or science". Let me tell you, I am so tired of that question. Let's just clear that question once and for all. I really don't see the point of asking it. Marketing is science and marketing is art. Why is that you might ask? Let me try to come up with some points of both sides:
Science:
Marketing is a science because marketing is about satisfying customers needs. To understand customer needs we need to develop scientific methods to learn about our customers and the needs they have. Also, the market and consumers generally behave in certain manners and deal with known variables. Porter's five forces is a good example of this. These five forces determine the profitability and behaviors within a market. The five forces being: competition within the industry, customers bargaining power, suppliers bargaining power, threat of entry of new competitors, threat of substitute products. These forces shape the strategy of the company.
Art:
Reading the points under science we might assume that marketing is all about science, but it is not. While we can predict behaviors of consumers and the market by using scientific methods, the decisions based on the scientific results are not always correct. Take Coca-Cola for example. They did extensive market research when developing a new product - a new coke. The majority of the participants in the research were very positive to the new coke. Management based their decision on these results and were sure of success when they launched the product. What happened? It was a disaster. People demanded the classic coke back. In fact, Coca-Cola had to relaunch the classic coke to the market because of the failure of the new coke. This shows that the science of marketing, even when being right within its terms it can be very wrong in terms of marketing.
So to conclude - marketing is both a science and art. This is why there are so big differences between marketers who succeed and those who do not succeed. On one side we have creative art directors trying to use their creative skills to do marketing - they usually fail because of being focused on creatively alone and not seeing the long-term picture. And then we have the scientific market researchers, who stand by their numbers and never make a decision without thoroughly going through all options. These people make safe decisions, but also wrong decisions because they are slow of making decisions - thus competitors can get the upper hand - and they fail to see the dynamics within the market and the arbitrary psychology of consumers.

Beyond the 4Ps: The 5Ts of Marketing Operations